Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Quote of the Day

'To all who wear the uniform, I make you this pledge: America will not run in the face of car bombers and assassins so long as I am your Commander-in-Chief.'

George W. Bush
President of the United States of America
United States Naval Academy
Annapolis, Maryland
November 30, 2005

New York, New York

Watching Imus in the Morning this morning. He just interviewed Senator Joe Lieberman (democrat) who dares to make statements like, 'Things are better in Iraq' and 'We are making great progress there.'

NOT the party line!

Following the interview, the crew on Imus' program start whinning and carrying on about how silly it is to think anything can be gained from 'winning' a war in Iraq.

Imus said, 'What are we going to do? Stay there till there are 3,000 dead?.' Bernard, one of the regualars on Imus, made a sarcastic statement, 'As long as it's not one of your family.'

That's the point that I blew up.

What exactly happens if we surrender? Huh? Have you thought that through?

That's what they want us to do. They call it 'a time-table for withdrawal'. But leaving a battle unfinished is surrender and defeat. (Iraq is a battle, not a war. The war is bigger than Iraq, in my opinion).

What happens then? New York? What happens then?

Imus, you are in the great state of New York. If politians keep interfering with this war and set a time-table for withdrawal, ignoring all reports from the military and civilian personnel on the ground in Iraq, than New York had better brace itself.

Imus, if we leave the Iraqi people now, after liberating them and without any further support to get on their feet, you had better go back to your ranch in New Mexico before the celebrating in Iran, Syria, etc is over.

I don't know if New York or Israel or California will go first, but New York is surely on their short list.

I'm sick to death of these politians trying to build their careers on the bodies of American soldiers. They seem to live for counting bodies.

Let the military handle the war and SHUT UP!

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Who Did Stanley 'Tookie' Williams Murder?

Who did Stanley 'Tookie' Williams murder? It's hard to know.

I Googled his name to try to get a better understanding of the issue and the man. The first few pages of Google results read page after page hailing Tookie's Redemption.

I had read an article a while back written by prison officials that were in direct opposition to the headlines and movie star statements about this death row inmate.


I tried to find the statement on the internet without success. I did find several sites that blast the prison officials for trying to discredit Tookie.


I did find the names of his victims and descriptions of the crimes he was sentenced to death for. But only on a few blogs. Michelle Malkin discusses his crimes and quotes the survivors of his victims. FullosseousFlap's Blog has a series of posts keeping watch of the Tookie story.

I'm sure there are more sites with information about and/or sympathic leanings towards the victims of the crimes. But I didn't have time to spend hours looking for them.


As part of Tookie's Redemption, he has written children stories to inform kids of the dangers of gang life. He says he doesn't want kids to end up like him.


The statement from the prison is decidedly debunked by Tookie's spokeswoman, Barbara Becnel. He has a spokeswoman?!?!


His supporter's challenge the prison's official statements regarding Tookie's Redemption or lack thereof, with statements like:
  • 'they are trying to discredit him at every turn'
  • 'it's an abuse of the prison system's power'
  • 'we knew they would try to malign him'
  • 'they are trying to drum up business on death row'
  • 'they can't even let him have his dignity'
  • 'the prison system's allegations are ridiculous'

The supporters of Tookie are also simply appalled that the Los Angeles District Attorney's office wrote a letter to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger that included details and photos of the crimes he had been convicted of committing. They called the photos and descriptions of his crimes bloody and prejudicial.

San Quentin spokesman Vernell Crittendon said "A con always will say one thing to you while the whole time he has another agenda," the San Quentin spokesman said. "I'm concerned that possibly this marketing that's going on ... leads the public to hear the words, but not to see that sleight of hand."

Crittendon has noted, among other things, that Tookie has an unusually large bank account for an inmate. He often gets $500 or $1000 at a time as compared to other inmates with $10 or $20. Tookie's spokeswoman says that's just cause people appreciate his work.


Tookie's spokeswoman and celebrity supporters have an answer to every allegation prision officials have made concerning Tookie.


Most of their comebacks are on the level of, 'Yeah? Your mama!'


So let's recap:
  • Tookie was convicted of horrific crimes {plural};
  • Tookie was sentenced to death by lethal injection in a state that supports the death penalty;
  • Tookie has run out of all his appeals;
  • Tookie has now turned to publicity and goof-ball celebrities who will get some air time to take up his cause;
  • Tookie's people say looking at photos of his crime scenes and descriptions of his crimes is prejudicial;
  • Tookie's people say he's been redeemed;
  • Tookie's people say he can help save children who might go into gang life;
  • Tookie's people say the prison officials are just out to get Tookie;
  • Tookie's people don't want us {we the people} to know the names or circumstances of the deaths of the people he was convicted of murdering;
  • Tookie is getting desperate;
  • Tookie is running out of time.

What's left to find out is whether or not Governor Schwarzenegger will have the guts to let justice take it's course.

If the governor does not interfer with the 1979 sentense, then perhaps Tookie will get his wish. Perhaps he'll be able to help the children from the communities he says he is reaching out to through his books.

He says he does not want these children to end up where he is.

Where he is right now is in the lime-light with a bunch of celebrities surrounding him and taking up his cause.

If he really wants those kids to see the results of gang life,

then ...

he should get his wish ...

with an exclamation point at the end of his wasted life.

We Have a Blue Star Banner in Our Window


Someone asked me what the Blue Star Banner on my blog means. It simply means that someone in this home is proudly serving in the United States Armed Forces.


The Blue Star Banner is properly displayed in a front window of the home. It should be hung inside, not outside.

The Blue Star Banner was first used during World War I. Some history of the banner can be found on the American Legion Website.

"The Blue Star Service Banner was designed and patented in 1917 by World War I Army Capt. Robert L. Queissner of the 5th Ohio Infantry who had two sons serving on the front line. It quickly became the unofficial symbol of a child in the service.


On Sept. 24, 1917, an Ohio congressman read the following into the Congressional Record: “…The mayor of Cleveland, the Chamber of Commerce and the governor of Ohio have adopted this service flag. The world should know of those who give so much for liberty. The dearest thing in all the world to a father and mother - their children.”

Other websites or blogs that might be helpful in learning more about Blue Star Banners include:

One of the interesting things that I have found is that the Blue Star Memorial Highways historical markers we see along American highways were taken from the tradition of the Blue Star Banner. The Blue Star Memorial Highways historical markers are tributes to Armed Forces that have defended the United States of America.

And that is what being a Blue Star Family is about. Hope it helps.

Quote of the Day

"Any man who may be asked what he did to make his life worthwhile,
I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction,
'I served in the United States Navy.'"

President John F. Kennedy
August 1963

Monday, November 28, 2005

Addendum to A Fierce Blow


And another thing ....

My husband was giving me a detailed explanation about the weather earlier tonight (
see post below). He really does know a lot about the weather. He used to have his pilots license, so he has a thing about weather and weather maps and the like.

When we were looking at the map on the internet, he instructs me, 'see the little red dots here?'. 'Yes', I reply. 'These are right over us now, this is the worst part of the storm.'

He moves his finger over the computer screen, showing me how the storm system is shaped. 'See how it is swirling back to the west here?'. He's pointing to a question mark looking area all the way up in Canada, where the storm sweeps back and under into the US. I ask him what that shows. 'This is a fierce blow', he says.

This is the front end of a cold front he tells me, but he assures me it's fast moving and we are directly under the worst of it at that very moment.

There's more, but that's the general gist of my weather tutorial for the evening.

All that said, I couldn't help but be impressed with the detail with which he could read the map and the weather systems blowing over the length of the United States.

The little red dots in particular stuck in my mind. Considering that not an hour earlier he couldn't find his pants.

'Where are my other pajamas?', he had asked me. That's translated to mean; where is a pair of sweat pants other than the one's I'm wearing right now?

I went back into our bedroom and picked up a pair of sweats and brought them to him in the family room. 'Where'd you find those?', he sounded surprised. It took me as long as it took me to walk to the bedroom and back. I had the distinct impression he'd been looking for a pair for a while.

He can read a weather map in great detail, but can't find a pair of pants in his closet.

And that is the fundamental difference between men and women.


Retailers Banning Christmas

Hardcore Conservative has posted the results of a survey done by the American Family Foundation on stores banning Christmas.

He writes:

We gathered advertising inserts from 11 different companies placed in two papers on Nov. 27 (Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal and Memphis Commercial Appeal.) Combined, the inserts totaled 280 pages.


Of the 11 companies, only one McRae’s/Belks had a reference to “Christmas.” They mentioned “Christmas” only two times. The other 10 companies did not mention “Christmas” a single time! While refusing to use “Christmas,” they used the term “holiday” a total of 59 times in their 10 inserts. The companies which refused to mention Christmas a single time in their 260 pages of insert promotions were Target, Kroger, Office Max, Walgreens, Sears, Staples, Lowe’s, J.C. Penney, Dell and Best Buy.

Their online petition can be found at this link.

Might be worth checking out :)

We're Having a Fierce Blow

My dearly beloved just checked the weather website and told me, 'we are having a fierce blow'. I pretty much already knew that because it's storming something fierce outside. But he confirmed it officially.

He actually gave me a more indepth analysis of the weather system that is currently immediately over our house. He's an expert on weather amongst many other things. I defer to him on issues of weather.

Our relationship is like that. There are some things he knows and some things I know and we both pretty much know which is which. But we don't always agree on which one of us knows more about which things. If that's confusing to you, you might have an idea of how things are in our house sometimes.

Nights like this make me think about flooding.

A few years ago we bought a house on the side of a mountain. Our house is no where near the top of the mountain, it's on the side of the mountain closer to the bottom than the top. Our yard is pretty much angular. It looks pretty, but is more of a problem in terms of mowing and lawn maintenance than either of us realized when we bought the property. Some people actually get nervous driving down (literally) our driveway. A few yards behind our house is what we call 'the gully'. The gully is where the yards merges into a severe drop off that does go straight down.

So imagine my surprise when we moved into the house and my dearly beloved takes out flood insurance. 'FLOOD INSURANCE?', I said. Flood insurance on a mountain? In my feminine mind, I was wondering how on earth water would rise this high!

He gave me 'the look'. That being a look I've become accustomed to and understand to mean he's wondering how on earth I could be this dense. As he's giving me the look he also gives me his usual elaborate detailed explanation about why we need flood insurance. I'll quote him verbatim: 'We need flood insurance.' The end.

At times like this I know it's futile to argue with him about it. So I deferred to his greater knowledge on these matters and let it go. But I was still grumbling in my own head about how dumb it is to have flood insurance when you live on the side of the mountain and Noah himself would have been safe this high up, for crying out loud.

It wasn't long before I found out why you need flood insurance when you live on the side of a mountain towards the bottom.

Did you know, when it pours rain for several days that all the water raining at your house is also raining at every point higher than your house? In addition, as the ground becomes saturated, it starts running downhill, gathering with other water running downhill it becomes little streams, by the time the little streams get toward the bottom of the mountain {like to our house} it's like little torrential rivers.

All this water from up the mountain heads directly at our house. I'm sure of it.

It doesn't sit in the house like traditional flooding, it flows through the house, yard and everything around it. That also explained to me why we had to have such an elaborate system of underground pipes and landscaping around the house and yard. Another issue I balked at.

I'm a big enough person to admit he was right and I was wrong. This time.

Senator Chuck Hagel's Opposition to Iraq War

The Median Sib quotes part of Senator Chuck Hagel's speech given to the Council on Foreign Relations on November 15, 2005. In the speech, Senator Hagel defends the Progressives 'questioning of our policies in Iraq' and should not be 'demonized' and called 'unpatriotic' for their 'challenge in a serious and responsible manner, offering solutions and alternatives' to the War.

The Median Sib offers a good rebuttal to Senator Hagel's arguments. There is a difference between questioning and deliberate undermining of policy.

Adding my two cents worth, the most recent attacks that 'Bush Lied' seem to be pettering out and are being replaced with 'We are losing the war'.

How is 'we are losing the war' helping?

First, we AREN'T losing the war. If you pay any attention to what the soldiers on the ground say, things are going very well. If you listen at all to the Iraqi people, you will hear their appreciation for what America and her allies have done to prove them the opportunity for a democratic society. If care enough to notice, they have had successful elections in Iraq. These things have not been mentioned frequently on the news, but if you try to get beyond the headlines, it seems most definite that we are NOT losing the war.

Second, why would we WANT to lose the war? Should we actually hang out a white flag and call it quits? Should we have our soldiers throw up their hands and surrender? Is that really what we want?

Third, and then what? What then? What happens if we convince the world we are losing, surrender and closet ourselves within the borders of the United States. What then?

It's one thing to say 'Bring Home The Troops'. It's a whole nuther thing to follow that line of thought all the way through to what the end result would be.

Yes, it's patriotic to question. But questioning and giving encouragement to the enemy are two entirely different things.

Bill O'Reilly Opines About Christmas

I know, I know, Bill O'Reilly is irritating, no doubt about it. But The O'Reilly Show is on right now and I don't have control of the remote. AND, you have to admit, he's entertaining and is right about some things {I don't always agree with him}.

He's opining about the ACLU's attempts to get Christmas out of the Christmas Season. He states, 'Corporate America should be down on their knees thanking Jesus that he was born.'

He goes on .... as he does .... but I have to agree with his talking points on that.

Go on with it Bill and Merry Christmas to you too.

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Celebrity Endorsements and Polls

Okay, I admit it, I read People Magazine sometimes.

{Please don’t tell my Mother. She’d chastise me for wasting my time with nonsense and filling my head with garbage. She’d be right of course, but still, having a good cynical chuckle at the antics of the self-absorbed-most-important-people-in-the-world highlighted in these types of publications can be entertaining. They are entertainers, after all!}

There is something about the unashamedly displaying of diamond-studded hedonism that makes it difficult to avert ones eyes.

Furthermore, I don’t begrudge celebrities their opinions or using their mega-means to showcase their opinions. They are people, like the rest of us, and have a right to their opinions. Well, they aren’t exactly like the rest of us are they?

Think of Tom Cruise pitting his ego-driven opinions against the Princeton educated Brooke Shields, the American Psychiatric Association and the American Medical Association regarding the need for medication for maladies such as post-partum depression. He made statements like, ‘It’s, uh, like, hormone driven, uh, like, you know, it’s not, uh, Scientifically proven, uh, like, to be a, you know like, a disease.’

Now that’s what I’m talking about. That’s entertaining!

Guess nobody gave Tom a script to memorize for that statement. Brooke Shields made some sort of dignified response to his allegations against her. I’m just guessing, but I think she surely has at least 20 I.Q. points on him. It’ really wasn’t a fair fight, but he picked it.

I saw a poll on the internet recently asking if we, the people, would be more inclined to spend money for products endorsed by famous celebrities.

So I asked myself, would I spend a few extra dollars to have a celebrity’s face on the packaging of whatever I’m buying? Hmmmm .... Can’t think of why I’d do that.

So I clicked ‘no’ on the poll. The poll took me to the results page and the results showed something like 98% no, 2% yes.

I would have clicked the Southern option if they’d of had it.

Not just no, but hell no.

ACLU Homeland Holiday Advisory System

I found this ACLU Homeland Holiday Advisory System on Stop the ACLU Blog. It's supposed to go in the little sidebar - but I can't get it to fit there, so it's here for your viewing pleasure.

I felt it was important to include here, because, after all. This blog has a little to do with the risks of practicing traditional holiday .... ah ... practices .... or .... traditions.

Anyway, it's about not doing things that have to do with Christmas during the Christmas Season.

I find these sorts of things very useful as I was raised in the usual American traditions of doing things like putting wreaths on the doorway, putting up Holiday Trees (Christmas Trees for those of you who haven't gotten with the program yet!), looking at Nativity Scenes, Christmas Caroling and other disgraces our American forefathers left us to have to live down.

I was going to work on trying to understand and forgive my parents for forcing these traditions on me when I was a mere child, infant even. But I have been studying the Progressive views (that's the new word for 'Liberal') and haven't found 'forgiveness' or 'understanding' or 'tolerance' in anything they put out yet.

Well, that's not entirely true. There's a lot from the Progressives (that's the new word for 'Liberals') about the INtolerance of the Conservatives (now called NeoCons, Nazis, Ignorant, Religious Right, and a whole host of other kind, well-meaning, tolerant and all-inclusive names I've seen them refered to in the Progressive writings).

It seems the Conservatives are the INtolerant ones and the Progressives (that's the new word for 'Liberals') are the tolerant ones. I'm sure since they say it, it must be so. I just have to find out how it is so.


I'll keep looking and I'm sure I'll be able to figure out how the new Proressive (that's the new word for 'Liberal') movement works through forgiveness, tolerance, and understanding.

When I figure it out, I'll let you know. In the meantime, you can use the alert I've posted here to help you keep track of when you are getting close to danger during this Holiday Season (that's the new phrase for 'Christmas Season').

arrivederci

Odds n Ins

Indigo Insights posted a note written to Wal-Mart about their stance on Christmas. Although I understand Wal-Mart has decided they will have Christmas afterall, I think it's worth looking at. She wrote a nice note about my letter to Cindy Shenanigans on another website.


Cindy Sheehan continues her tour of duty. But from reading The Political Teen and other posts today about Ms. Shenaigans book signing, she may be coming to the end of her tour.

Quote of the Day

'When you see all that rhetorical smoke billowing up from the Democrats, well ladies and gentlemen, I'd follow the example of their nominee; don't inhale.'
Ronald Reagan


I found this quote in the title of Angry Republican Mom's Blog - check her out.

Poster of the Day



Cindy, think about it.

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Quote of the Day

From One Soldiers Mother to Another

Cindy,

I saw another interview with you today, since I wrote the post saying there were no tears from you. I saw the tears, I saw your face. I saw the struggle in your face and eyes.

My heart broke for you, for a moment.

I can’t even bring myself to make sarcastic remarks right now. Others are reluctant to criticize you as well. That’s why you are useful. Do you understand that?

Your precious son became a man, as mine has. He made the choices of a man, whether you agreed with his choices or not, they were his to make. Honor him. Honor his courage, integrity and service to his country, whether you agree with the choices he made or not.

Honor him. He apparently was an honorable man.

Go home, Cindy. Start working on mending the wounds in your family. Be there for your other children, they are grieving too.

Go home. Your son has died an honorable death, you will never be able to out run your grief. It’ll always be with you. Let yourself grieve and quit trying to run from it.

Go home. Go home and find your life. Spewing blame on everyone but the one’s who brought this war to our homeland is only prolonging your grief, and the war, and the danger to our nations other soldiers.

Go home, Cindy, you are being used to the advantage of some who have agendas that are not in the interests of what your son died for.

As one soldier’s mother to another I look at you and am so sad in empathy for your loss and a paralyzing fear for my own son.

As one soldier’s mother to another I look at you with an anger I can’t put words to. I’m angry because I believe your actions and words are endangering our soldiers. If your words and actions, screamed loudly over international airways, get one more American soldier killed, you should be tried for treason.

As one soldier’s mother to another, if your benefactors use your words and actions to promote their agendas, and my son is harmed or killed as a result, I will follow your example. I will be camping outside your house and demanding you be tried for the murder of my son.

Go home, Cindy, your current path will come to no good end.

With Sincere Sympathy and Warmest Regards,

Beth



More Happy Birthday Wishes

My sister posted a tribute to another one of my sisters for her birthday {I have lots of sibs}
The Median Sib said it all.
'nuff said.
Thanks Carol :)

My sister Joan wrote a dynamic post about her birthday, well worth the read.
Thanks Joan :)

Friday, November 25, 2005

Barbara Bush Didn't Raise George Right!

Cindy Shenanigans wrote a letter to Barbara Bush telling her she didn’t raise her son right. She told her in the letter that George killed her son.

I didn’t know that!

I thought he had died in a similar manner as warriors throughout the ages have died. In combat. In combat with an enemy of whatever nation, cause, belief system the warrior is defending.

I’m listening closely to Cindy and her supporters. From what I can deduce, our soldiers are over there doing horrible things to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. Horrible things!

I thought we had an all volunteer Army. I was wrong. Our soldiers have been forced to go grab poor helpless foreign lands to feed to the Imperialist George Bush in his never ending hunger for power.

Golly-wow! I know some American Soldiers. I didn’t know they were such bad people.

Naw, I’m just kidding. I know, I know. We Support Our Troops, it’s the War we don’t support.

It’s not the troops it’s the war we don’t like. The troops are just the agent used by George Bush to promote his agenda of an American Empire.

When Cindy and the like carry on about American’s putting underwear on war-prisoners heads being comparable torture to that of cutting off the heads of Nicholas Burg, Daniel Pearl and others with a kitchen knife, taking 20 minutes to do it, they aren’t critizing our troops. They are simply pointing out the evils of the Bush Regime.

Cindy wrote a letter to Barbara telling her she didn’t raise her son right. We in the South know what not raising a child right means. It is not a good thing.

I wonder how Cindy’s other children are doing while she’s basking in the lime-light.






Loose Lips Sink Ships



And if you tell them when we are pulling troops out.
And if you send the message the American public is not behind our troops.


Cindy Sheehan and Me


Cindy, I have a son in the military too, should I quit my job, leave my husband and children and join you in Texas? I’m perplexed. I want to do the right thing. What is the right thing?

Cindy Shenanigans is back at her protest site in Texas. The media is using terms like ‘stalking’ and ‘haunting’ the President. But she looks happy to be doing it.

Apparently, after having to spend some time with her family over Thanksgiving, she is once again free to continue her own personal tour of duty.

She is pictured arriving at her camp in Texas smiling, hugging and greeting her friends. When interviewed she gushes, ‘I’m so happy to be back here with my friends’. I don’t know her friends, but the pictures on TV of the dozen or so protesters there send my memories back to incense, ripped jeans with patches all over them, ironing our hair so it’s be perfectly straight and peace symbols.

But then, I’m from the fly-over world, so what I think I know is not relevant.

In the brief interview I saw this morning, Ms. Sheehan was smiling broadly while bemoaning the fact this protest is necessary. She said she is doing this for her son’s memory. I can’t question that. She’s useful because no one can question what is in her heart.

She said she’s doing this for her son’s memory, smiling from ear to ear and hugging her new found friends, walking arm-in-arm with them all surrounding her. All getting closer and closer to her as the camera zoomed in on her. Cindy Sheehan, the center of the movement, the center of the attention. All eyes on Cindy.

She is so brave to be doing this for her son. International media attention. The darling of the radical left, the toast of the aging hippies still clinging to the ‘good ol’ days’ when they had something to protest, and, lest we forget, book deals. There’ll probably be a movie.

She is so brave to be putting herself through this in memory of her son.

As per Ms. Sheehan, many soldiers don’t know that the military has to fight sometimes. Bush should have told them that.

I’ve been proud of my son, a brand spanking new Army Officer serving overseas. He volunteered, and has excelled in his chosen profession. He chose this path, my son did. He knew that serving in the military could mean he will have to face battle with an enemy at some point. We knew that too.

I guess all parents don’t tell their children that joining the military could be dangerous. We tell them the dangers of driving too fast, of driving under the influence, of being sexually promiscuous, of walking alone downtown in the middle of the night. I guess some forget to tell them about the dangers in the world.

Bush should have told us that joining the military means you have to go to battle sometimes. Bush should have told us when the government is paying you to be in the Reserves that means when the Reserves are called up, the government wants a return on their investment.

Bush should have told us.




Thursday, November 24, 2005

Birthday Wishes

For my daughter who is celebrating her birthday today.

I love you and I'm very proud of you.

Eventhough you think this blog is annoying

Happy Thanksgiving


I spent the day at my Mother's with various brothers and sisters, neices and nephews. It was a traditional day of gluttonous American over-indulgence. (belch).

Predictably, I got the eating-too-much-turkey-sleepiness about 4 p.m. and chastized myself for my weakness. I justified it to myself by reminding myself that I've only begun my journey towards understanding the evils of American traditions and culture. So I cut myself some slack on that. Since I had already spent the day as a capitalist pig, I decided I would cut myself a piece of cake too, and it wouldn't be any worse if I put ice cream on top. So I did. I even cut the piece of cake a little larger. There's always tomorrow.

I noticed as I drove home from my Mother's a large red sign in front of a large national hardware store, 'Holiday Trees'. I noticed an enormous sign hanging on a local Chinese restaurant, 'Merry Christmas'. Interesting cultural confusion. Apparently, the news that Christmas has become politically incorrect hasn't reached the Orient yet. Maybe the internet will help get the word out.

'Holiday Trees'. Does it have the same festive ring as 'Christmas Trees'?

Gute Nacht

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Quote for PETA

People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
~ Unknown ~

Holiday - Holy Day

This enlightenment things just gets more and more complicated.

I just read on The Median Sibs Blog that the word holiday is derived from HOLY-Day so I looked it up:

  • Main Entry: 1hol·i·day Pronunciation: 'hä-l&-"dA, British usually 'hä-l&-dEFunction: nounEtymology: Middle English, from Old English hAligdæg, from hAlig holy + dæg day
  • Main Entry: holy day Function: noun: a day set aside for special religious observance

So, if we change over to saying 'Happy Holidays' rather than 'Merry Christmas', we are still getting Church and State all mixed up together.

Back to the drawing board for this member of the unwashed masses!

What If They Gave A Sale, And Nobody Came?

What would happen if Wal*Mart and Target and other corporate giants had their annual day after Thanksgiving sale and nobody shopped?

These enormous-wealthier-than-anything-our-backward-middle_American-minds-can-imagine-giant-corporations have instructed their employees to not use the greeting ‘Merry Christmas’. They are to use ‘Happy Holidays’ instead. It’s fine to sell holiday items as long as the items do not have religious connotations (except for religious items that don’t have anything to do with Christianity, of course).

I’m sure anyone reading this already knows all about this.

When these corporate policies became public, Wal*Mart backtracked. Their corporate statement reassures us that this has all been one big misunderstanding. They really didn’t mean THAT, they are just trying to be all-inclusive. They have to think globally after all, they are Wal*Mart. They go on to assure us that their ‘associates’ are more than welcome to use the greeting ‘Merry Christmas’ as long as the customer uses that same greeting first. Otherwise, ‘Happy Holidays’ it is.

Target has not backtracked.

These enormous-wealthier-than-anything-our-backward-middle-American-minds-can-imagine-giant-corporations aren’t particularly concerned that a minimum of 85% of their consumer base are American citizens who were raised in the Christian faith. They aren’t particularly concerned that 40% of their annual earnings are garnered during the ‘Holiday’ season.

They know we’ll shop there anyway.

We’ll shop there because we don’t really believe it, not deep down inside. Our rights can’t be taken away. Not like this, ebbing away a little at a time.

One little thing and then another. Not like this. When one change happens, we squirm, then adjust. Then another change happens, we squirm, then adjust. Then another change, then another, then another. And so on. We squirm here and there, but we adjust. We always adjust. Then we go get a pedicure.

We are Americans. This is how we’ve always lived, we believe it’s how we always will live. Why would it change? We are free. We have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom in the pursuit of happiness and all the other freedoms they wrote up in that document way back when.

We are free.

Just don’t say ‘Merry Christmas’ this year.

Quote of the Moment

I found this on Daddy's Roses. Further proof of the levels to which the insidious eroding of our American values of Seperation of Church and State have gone.

'I ask all Americans to give thanks on that day for the blessings Almighty God has bestowed upon us, and seek to be good stewards of what we have received.'
~Jimmy Carter
President of the United States of America
November, 1979.

A Little Thanksgiving History

In 1789, Congressman Elias Boudinot of New Jersey proposed in Congress a resolution urging President Washington to:

Recommend to the people of the United States a day of public Thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of the Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity to establish a Constitution of government for their safety and happiness.

After much debate, President Washington issued the first National Thanksgiving Proclamation, setting November 26, 1789 as Thanksgiving and a national holiday. Washington stated in his proclamation:

Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquillity, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.

"Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the 3rd day of October, A.D. 1789."

George Washington
I found the text of George Washington's original Thanksgiving proclaimation in a number of places. Jeff Cornwall has it posted on his The Entrepreneurial Mind Blog.

What about Thanksgiving?

I stayed home from work today to do a little preparation for Thanksgiving tomorrow. Between bouts of scrubbing, dealing with Mount Neverest and polishing wood floors, I got to thinking about the Christmas issue again.

'What', I wondered, 'if Thanksgiving is also an assault on the unwashed masses masquerading as a benign traditional holiday?'

A quick look around the blog-sphere and there seem to be blogs everywhere making reference to Thanksgiving and what they are thankful for.
Thanksgiving and Christmas, Thanksgiving, It's All About Name, Amy's Humble Musings.

RuthLace devotes an entire post to Thanksgiving traditions from her youth compared to now. She and Daddys Roses have referenced a forum asking about Thanksgiving traditions and what we are thankful for.
I found one refugee expressing his gratitude to America:

American Dream provides reason for thanksgiving
Next year, I will celebrate the 50th anniversary of being a freedom fighter in Budapest, Hungary. Our short-lived and bloody attempt to obtain democracy for our nation failed.
But as a result of fleeing to America, I've become most thankful for the following:
{click link for the rest of the article}

And there were these sorts of websites and posts:

Lone Pawn writes in his Thanksgiving Special Post:

Thanksgiving is the day when the dominant white culture (and, sadly, most of the rest of the non-white but non-indigenous population) celebrates the beginning of a genocide that was, in fact, blessed by the men we hold up as our heroic founding fathers.


In my quest for enlightenment, I realize that the term 'Thanksgiving' undoubtedly refers to 'giving thanks' which refers to 'prayer'.

Of course the next question is: 'Who are we giving thanks to?'.

Well, we ALL know the answer to THAT!

This can not possibly be good for our families and children. Especially if it is being mentioned in schools and public government buildings.

More brainwashing, more molding of little vulnerable minds. And those of us in the ill-informed fly-over space of 'Middle America' are dupped again!

After the next load of laundry I'll look into this more.....

Ciao

Quote of the Day
'Ho, Ho, Ho,
Merry Christmas'
~ Saint Nicholas {with a wink and a nod}

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Merry Christmas!!

I've been reading blogs for a while, thinking of starting a blog, jumping on the band-wagon. But everyone is posting opinions on blogs now days, so who needs another opinion cluttering up the information highway?

Plus, I really couldn't think of a reason to start a blog.

BUT ....

tonight .....


I heard a blurb on Hannity and Cohen on Fox News about a Holiday Tree on the Boston Commons. It was a gift given as a Christmas Tree.

I'm hearing everywhere that Christmas compromises the seperation of Church and State - WHAT!!??!!

We've had Christmas in this country since, well, since 1776. (Probably even before that, but it's wasn't 'this country' before that)

I can't believe we are just now finding out that it has been such as afront to our rights as citizens. Why wouldn't we have known this before now? Why didn't the government tell us we were being mislead into believing that Christmas was a worthy holiday?

It's been.... 1, 2, 3 ..... wait a minute I don't have enough fingers and toes, I have to get a calculator .... okay ... it's been 229 years!!!! Talk about slow responses. (FEMA?)

Christmas is being excluded under the guise that other religions are being excluded by Christmas. I'm still pondering that logic.

The claim is that Christmas is 'proselytizing' our children and that the Dreaded Religious Right is using Christmas to sneak God into our schools and government buildings.

And to think that all these years, we've had Christmas and didn't even know the damage it was doing. We had Christmas for years before I ever heard there was such a thing as the Dreaded Religious Right.

We were so ignorant. We thought it was Christmas and didn't know it had so many hidden agendas and was really a sly political tool.

When I figure out how to do links, I'll put links to the ariticles I refer to in this post. I want to give credit where credit is due.

Meanwhile - be careful you don't innocently get sucked into some mind-altering Christmas celebration. No Christmas Caroling, no Nativity Scenes.

I can help. I'll get a list together of dos and don'ts that we can all use as a handy-dandy-quick-reference-guide-for-what-is-not-appropriate-during-the-Christmas-Season. Whoops - see how easy it is, I already did it myself. I meant HOLIDAY Season. It really is insidious, isn't it?